Inflation Calculator
Project purchasing power decay over time or evaluate real purchasing power adjustments on returns.
The Data Behind Inflation
Reference tables, benchmarks, and research-backed context for interpreting your results.
The Purchasing Power Decay Table: $100,000 Over Time
At different inflation rates, the same nominal balance loses purchasing power at dramatically different speeds. This table shows what $100,000 in nominal terms is worth in today's dollars across common inflation scenarios:
| Inflation Rate |
In 10 Years |
In 20 Years |
In 30 Years |
In 40 Years |
| 2.0% (Fed target) |
$82,035 |
$67,297 |
$55,207 |
$45,289 |
| 2.5% (30-yr US avg) |
$78,120 |
$61,027 |
$47,674 |
$37,243 |
| 3.0% (moderate) |
$74,409 |
$55,368 |
$41,199 |
$30,656 |
| 4.0% (elevated) |
$67,556 |
$45,639 |
$30,832 |
$20,829 |
| 7.0% (2022 peak) |
$50,835 |
$25,842 |
$13,137 |
$6,678 |
| 10.0% (historical crisis) |
$38,554 |
$14,864 |
$5,731 |
$2,209 |
At the Fed's 2% target, $100,000 loses nearly half its purchasing power over 30 years. At 7% — the 2022 peak — it loses 86.9%.
Inflation by Decade: What History Actually Shows
Knowing what previous decades looked like helps you stress-test your projections beyond the optimistic baseline:
| Decade |
Avg Annual Inflation |
Key Driver |
Notable Events |
| 1960s |
2.3% |
Steady growth era |
Vietnam War spending begins to accelerate late prices |
| 1970s |
7.1% |
Oil shocks + stagflation |
1973 OPEC embargo, 1979 energy crisis |
| 1980s |
5.6% |
Volcker disinflation |
Fed raised rates to 20%+ to break inflation |
| 1990s |
3.0% |
Tech boom, globalisation |
Disinflation through productivity gains |
| 2000s |
2.6% |
Housing bubble, GFC |
2008 crisis briefly pushed inflation negative |
| 2010s |
1.8% |
QE era, subdued demand |
Near-zero rates, below-target inflation |
| 2020s (to 2024) |
4.1% |
Supply chain + stimulus |
2022 peaked at 9.1% CPI, highest since 1981 |
A single decade of elevated inflation can permanently reset your purchasing power baseline. Real returns matter far more than nominal returns.
Inflation vs. Investment Return: The Real Return Matrix
The number that actually determines wealth growth is the gap between investment return and inflation (the "real return"). This matrix maps nominal returns against inflation:
| Nominal Return → |
3% |
5% |
7% |
10% |
12% |
| Inflation 2% |
+1.0% real |
+2.9% real |
+4.9% real |
+7.8% real |
+9.8% real |
| Inflation 3% |
0.0% real |
+1.9% real |
+3.9% real |
+6.8% real |
+8.7% real |
| Inflation 4% |
-1.0% real |
+0.9% real |
+2.9% real |
+5.8% real |
+7.7% real |
| Inflation 7% |
-3.9% real |
-1.9% real |
0.0% real |
+2.8% real |
+4.7% real |
*Real return calculated using Fisher equation: (1 + nominal) / (1 + inflation) − 1
⚠
The Real Return Warning
At 7% inflation, a savings account earning 5% APY doesn't just underperform — it actively loses 1.9% of purchasing power per year. Keeping large cash balances during inflationary periods is functionally equivalent to a guaranteed loss.
The Hidden Inflation Tax on Retirement Accounts
Most people calculate their retirement number in today's dollars, then forget to account for the inflation that will occur before retirement. This creates a systematic underestimation of target portfolio size:
| Years to Retirement |
Inflation Rate |
Multiplier Needed |
$1M Target Becomes |
| 10 years |
2.5% |
1.28× |
$1,280,000 |
| 10 years |
4.0% |
1.48× |
$1,480,000 |
| 20 years |
2.5% |
1.64× |
$1,640,000 |
| 20 years |
4.0% |
2.19× |
$2,190,000 |
| 30 years |
2.5% |
2.09× |
$2,090,000 |
| 30 years |
4.0% |
3.24× |
$3,240,000 |
⚠
Retirement Target Adjustment
A 30-year-old who needs $1,000,000 in today's dollars at retirement, assuming 4% average inflation over 30 years, actually needs to accumulate $3,240,000 in nominal terms. This figure — not the unadjusted million — is the real target to build toward.